Best strategies for patient education about anticoagulation with warfarin: a systematic review
© Wofford et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 23 June 2007
Accepted: 14 February 2008
Published: 14 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Decker Christensen|
|11 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Fitzmaurice|
|25 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heinz Völler|
|10 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - James Wofford|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Decker Christensen|
|26 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heinz Völler|
|8 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Fitzmaurice|
|25 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - James Wofford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-40|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.