Improving the accuracy of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal disease notification rates using data linkage
© Mak and Watkins; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 22 January 2008
Accepted: 30 May 2008
Published: 30 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Jan 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin|
|19 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Moon|
|23 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Rochelle Watkins|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Moon|
|1 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin|
|19 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Rochelle Watkins|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Rochelle Watkins|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|30 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-118|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.