Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Yuichi Katsumura1,
  • Hideo Yasunaga2Email author,
  • Tomoaki Imamura3,
  • Kazuhiko Ohe4 and
  • Hiroshi Oyama5
Contributed equally
BMC Health Services Research20088:106

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-106

Received: 12 October 2007

Accepted: 21 May 2008

Published: 21 May 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
4 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prasanta Dey
12 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
4 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
7 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 5
7 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 6
16 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 May 2008 Editorially accepted
21 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
(2)
Department of Health Management and Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
(3)
Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University
(4)
Department of Medical Informatics and Economics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
(5)
Department of Clinical Information Engineering, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo

Advertisement