Access to electronic health knowledge in five countries in Africa: a descriptive study
© Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 12 March 2007
Accepted: 17 May 2007
Published: 17 May 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Mar 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Watt|
|10 Apr 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harry McConnell|
|1 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Helen J Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Helen J Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 May 2007||Editorially accepted|
|17 May 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-7-72|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.