Utilization and expenditures of veterans obtaining primary care in community clinics and VA medical centers: an observational cohort study
- Matthew L Maciejewski1, 2Email author,
- Mark Perkins†3,
- Yu-Fang Li†3, 5,
- Michael Chapko†3, 4,
- John C Fortney†6, 7 and
- Chuan-Fen Liu†3, 4
© Maciejewski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 08 November 2006
Accepted: 18 April 2007
Published: 18 April 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Nov 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Todd Wagner|
|21 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fredric Wolinsky|
|20 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Maciejewski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fredric Wolinsky|
|28 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Todd Wagner|
|16 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Maciejewski|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Apr 2007||Editorially accepted|
|18 Apr 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-7-56|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.