Willing to wait?: The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care
© Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 06 September 2006
Accepted: 28 February 2007
Published: 28 February 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Sep 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Rohrer|
|23 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz|
|25 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janko Kersnik|
|14 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Rajesh Balkrishnan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Rohrer|
|22 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janko Kersnik|
|24 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz|
|23 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Rajesh Balkrishnan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Rajesh Balkrishnan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Feb 2007||Editorially accepted|
|28 Feb 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-7-31|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.