The care of patients with subthreshold depression in primary care: Is it all that bad? A qualitative study on the views of general practitioners and patients
© Backenstrass et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 09 January 2007
Accepted: 21 November 2007
Published: 21 November 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jan 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pim Cuijpers|
|19 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm|
|25 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Margaret Maxwell|
|30 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Backenstrass|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm|
|22 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pim Cuijpers|
|14 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Backenstrass|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Nov 2007||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-7-190|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.