A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care
© May; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 11 February 2006
Accepted: 07 July 2006
Published: 07 July 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Feb 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh|
|18 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Griffiths|
|28 Apr 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Carl May|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Griffiths|
|3 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Carl May|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jul 2006||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jul 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-6-86|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.