Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE
© McKinlay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 22 February 2006
Accepted: 06 June 2006
Published: 06 June 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Feb 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Moehr|
|14 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Glanville|
|12 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - R. James McKinlay|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Glanville|
|5 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - R. James McKinlay|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jun 2006||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-6-67|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.