Peer Review reports
From: What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee |
8 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann |
15 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Groenewegen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann |
18 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee |
7 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Groenewegen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
21 Feb 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Feb 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-5-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.