Is there value in using physician billing claims along with other administrative health care data to document the burden of adolescent injury? An exploratory investigation with comparison to self-reports in Ontario, Canada
© Potter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 12 August 2004
Accepted: 18 February 2005
Published: 18 February 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Aug 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Forjuoh|
|30 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eleni Petridou|
|21 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Beth Potter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Forjuoh|
|4 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Beth Potter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Beth Potter|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Feb 2005||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-5-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.