Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group
© Atkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 23 January 2004
Accepted: 22 December 2004
Published: 22 December 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Jan 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|22 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Bigby|
|25 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph WATINE|
|30 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anja Tuulonen|
|9 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Andy Oxman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anja Tuulonen|
|13 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Andy Oxman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Dec 2004||Editorially accepted|
|22 Dec 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-4-38|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.