Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?

  • Giulio Formoso1,
  • Lorenzo Moja2, 3,
  • Francesco Nonino1,
  • Pietro Dri4,
  • Antonio Addis5,
  • Nello Martini5 and
  • Alessandro Liberati1, 2, 6Email author
BMC Health Services Research20033:24

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-24

Received: 16 August 2003

Accepted: 23 December 2003

Published: 23 December 2003

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Aug 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tommaso Trenti
25 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle
18 Nov 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Nov 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Nov 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 7
26 Nov 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 Dec 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 8
20 Dec 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
23 Dec 2003 Editorially accepted
23 Dec 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-3-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro per la Valutazione della Efficacia della Assistenza Sanitaria (CeVEAS)
(2)
Centro Cochrane Italiano, Istituto Mario Negri
(3)
Istituto di Igiene, Università degli Studi di Milano
(4)
Agenzia Zadig, Giornalismo Scientifico
(5)
Direzione Generale Valutazione Farmaci e Farmacovigilanza, Ministero dalla Salute
(6)
Cattedra di Epidemiologia Clinica e Statistica Medica Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia

Advertisement