Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference

  • Alan A Montgomery1Email author,
  • Anna Graham1,
  • Philip H Evans2 and
  • Tom Fahey1
BMC Health Services Research20022:8

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-8

Received: 03 December 2001

Accepted: 26 March 2002

Published: 26 March 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Dec 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager
15 Jan 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan van Rooyen
1 Feb 2002 Author responded Author comments - Alan Montgomery
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Feb 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Feb 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager
25 Mar 2002 Author responded Author comments - Alan Montgomery
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Mar 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Mar 2002 Editorially accepted
26 Mar 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-2-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
(2)
Institute of General Practice, School of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter

Advertisement