Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Oct 2001 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - AS Ostry |
19 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - C. Gail Hepburn |
6 Nov 2001 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Krueger |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Nov 2001 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
23 Nov 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - AS Ostry |
13 Dec 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - C. Gail Hepburn |
3 Jan 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Krueger |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Jan 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
28 Feb 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - C. Gail Hepburn |
11 Mar 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Krueger |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Mar 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
20 Mar 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Krueger |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
20 Mar 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
25 Mar 2002 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Mar 2002 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-2-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.