Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Resource use data by patient report or hospital records: Do they agree?

  • Andrew DM Kennedy1Email author,
  • Anne P Leigh-Brown2,
  • David J Torgerson3,
  • James Campbell4 and
  • Adrian Grant2
BMC Health Services Research20022:2

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-2

Received: 26 November 2001

Accepted: 17 January 2002

Published: 17 January 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Nov 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan
20 Dec 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Wilson
11 Jan 2002 Author responded Author comments - Andrew D M Kennedy
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2002 Editorially accepted
17 Jan 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-2-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen
depatment of health science and center for health economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York
Princess Margaret Rose Orthopaedic Hospital, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh NHS Trust