From: Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study
By Funding Source: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Adequate | Inadequate | Unclear | Total | OR* (95% CI) |
Industry Only | 16 | 1 | 27 | 44 | 1.00 (ref) |
Not for Profit Only | 13 | 2 | 13 | 28 | .55 (.21, 1.42) |
Mixed + | 6 | 1 | 15 | 22 | 1.35 (.46, 3.98) |
Not Reported | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1.26 (.21, 7.64) |
Total | 36 | 5 | 59 | 100 | Â |
p = .377 | |||||
By Direction and Statistical Significance of Trial Outcome: | |||||
Favoured New | 21 | 4 | 42 | 67 | 1.00 (ref) |
Favoured Conventional | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | .24 (.04, 1.32) |
Neutral | 7 | 1 | 11 | 19 | .82 (.29, 2.31) |
Unclear | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | .79 (.16, 3.84) |
Total | 36 | 5 | 59 | 100 | Â |
p = .678 |