Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study
© Clifford et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 23 April 2002
Accepted: 4 September 2002
Published: 4 September 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Apr 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jun 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jul 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Tammy Clifford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jul 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jul 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|25 Aug 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Tammy Clifford|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Aug 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Aug 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|3 Sep 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Tammy Clifford|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|3 Sep 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Sep 2002||Editorially accepted|
|4 Sep 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-2-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.