Volume 14 Supplement 2

Health Services Research: Evidence-based practice

Open Access

Best practice integrated primary/secondary health care governance - applying evidence to Australia’s health reform agenda

  • Caroline Nicholson1, 2,
  • Claire Jackson1 and
  • John Marley1
BMC Health Services Research201414(Suppl 2):O6

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-S2-O6

Published: 7 July 2014


There is an identified need for more robust and high-quality evidence to inform decisions about how to develop and deliver integrated primary/secondary health care. There is no single model of integrated care that is suited to all contexts, settings and circumstances. Researchers and policy-makers need to work together with practitioners to develop, evaluate and implement effective approaches. For the goals of health reform to be realized, primary health care and secondary care organisations must work together to achieve co-ordinated and integrated healthcare services. This study aimed to describe the elements of a health care system capable of supporting effective integrated primary/secondary care and how many of these governance elements are identifiable within Australia’s current health care reform environment.

Materials and methods

This study presents the results of a systematic review in the development of a framework to achieve a ‘best practice’ governance model for integrated primary/secondary health care [1] and the application of the findings to key policy statements regarding integrated care delivery [2].


The systematic review identifies ten elements linked to successful primary/secondary health care integration projects - a population focus; shared clinical priorities; joint planning; using data as a quality improvement tool across the continuum; innovation; effective change management; an appropriately trained workforce; integrated information communication systems; incentives; and, patient engagement. The Australian reform environment has made steady progress in building integrated governance arrangements around some elements, whilst others remain ad-hoc or non-existent. Formal documents mostly relate to silos of sector activity and not the interface.


To apply important evidence to health care policy, and maximise reform success, we must review current governance frameworks to address the gaps identified in this paper. Whilst it is challenging to bring historically-disparate partners together into formal agreements, they are essential to creating the scalable ‘business rules’ and sustainable environment required to achieve the new care models we seek.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Queensland
Mater Health Services


  1. Nicholson C, Jackson C, Marley J: A governance model for integrated primary/secondary care for the health-reforming first world - results of a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2013, 13: 528-10.1186/1472-6963-13-528. (accessed Feb 2014), [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/528]PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nicholson C, Jackson C, Marley J: Best practice integrated health care governance - applying evidence to Australia’s health reform agenda. MJA Supplement on “Implementation research - making a difference at the coalface”. 2014Google Scholar


© Nicholson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.