“It’s easier in pharmacy”: why some patients prefer to pay for flu jabs rather than use the National Health Service
© Anderson and Thornley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 May 2013
Accepted: 23 January 2014
Published: 24 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying-Chun Li|
|17 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannah Christensen|
|4 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying-Chun Li|
|23 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannah Christensen|
|8 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|8 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-35|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.