Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England
© Ovseiko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 27 August 2013
Accepted: 17 January 2014
Published: 20 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewan Ferlie|
|6 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Wartman|
|25 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter brooks|
|2 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Pavel Ovseiko|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewan Ferlie|
|10 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Wartman|
|15 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter brooks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.