Quality and safety issues highlighted by patients in the handling of laboratory test results by general practices–a qualitative study
© Cunningham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 27 December 2013
Accepted: 15 April 2014
Published: 6 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson|
|22 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katrin Gehring|
|12 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Bowie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Bowie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-206|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.