A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
© Oliver et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 2 July 2013
Accepted: 20 December 2013
Published: 3 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Oliver|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marianna Fotaki|
|31 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson|
|18 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Oliver|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Dec 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.