Improving access to emergent spinal care through knowledge translation: an ethnographic study
© Webster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 23 May 2013
Accepted: 4 April 2014
Published: 14 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Fiona Webster|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Middleton|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Gotlib Conn|
|21 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Fiona Webster|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-169|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.