Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Does the perception of fairness and standard of care in the health system depend on the field of study? Results of an empirical analysis

BMC Health Services Research201414:166

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-166

Received: 4 February 2013

Accepted: 2 April 2014

Published: 12 April 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kathrin Damm
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - stephen maluka
19 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samia Hurst
3 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kathrin Damm
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samia Hurst
10 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - stephen maluka
13 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kathrin Damm
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
12 Apr 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-166

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Leibniz University Hannover, Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH)
(2)
Leibniz University Hannover, Center for Risk and Insurance

Advertisement