Does the perception of fairness and standard of care in the health system depend on the field of study? Results of an empirical analysis
© Damm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 4 February 2013
Accepted: 2 April 2014
Published: 12 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kathrin Damm|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - stephen maluka|
|19 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samia Hurst|
|3 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kathrin Damm|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samia Hurst|
|10 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - stephen maluka|
|13 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kathrin Damm|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-166|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.