Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prospective cohort study protocol to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Quality of Trauma Care Patient-Reported Experience Measure (QTAC-PREM)

BMC Health Services Research201313:98

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-98

Received: 16 January 2013

Accepted: 4 March 2013

Published: 14 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-98

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary
(2)
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary
(3)
Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary
(4)
W21C Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary
(5)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary
(6)
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary
(7)
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary
(8)
Teaching Research & Wellness Building, University of Calgary

Advertisement