Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
© Burström et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 April 2012
Accepted: 4 March 2013
Published: 12 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tove Giske|
|31 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Meg Wise|
|6 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hans Thulesius|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tove Giske|
|1 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hans Thulesius|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tove Giske|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-95|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.