Factors influencing health care utilisation among Aboriginal cardiac patients in central Australia: a qualitative study
© Artuso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 January 2012
Accepted: 14 February 2013
Published: 6 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaouli Shahid|
|6 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Fuller|
|24 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Daniel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Fuller|
|3 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Daniel|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Fuller|
|1 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Daniel|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Daniel|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|4 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|14 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|6 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-83|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.