Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - marijke boorsma |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Banaszak-Holl |
7 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - margaret petrina sweeney |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
9 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - marijke boorsma |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - marijke boorsma |
8 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - margaret petrina sweeney |
26 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Banaszak-Holl |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Banaszak-Holl |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
15 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - marijke boorsma |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
15 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
17 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.