Developing process guidelines for trauma care in the Netherlands for severely injured patients: results from a Delphi study
© Hoogervorst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 June 2012
Accepted: 14 February 2013
Published: 3 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elisabeth Hoogervorst|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Rosengart|
|9 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carmen Hall|
|1 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elisabeth Hoogervorst|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Rosengart|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-79|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.