Exploring consumers’ attitudes towards informal patient payments using the combined method of cluster and multinomial regression analysis - the case of Hungary
© Baji et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 June 2012
Accepted: 9 February 2013
Published: 15 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Petra Baji|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aziza Joseph Mwisongo|
|8 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Obinna Onwujekwe|
|22 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Petra Baji|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Obinna Onwujekwe|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-62|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.