Technical evaluation of methods for identifying chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in healthcare claims databases
© Weycker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 July 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2013
Published: 13 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Derek Weycker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michel Moreau|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Seoyoung Kim|
|29 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Derek Weycker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Seoyoung Kim|
|9 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michel Moreau|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.