Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils

  • Mikaela Nygren1Email author,
  • Kerstin Roback1,
  • Annica Öhrn1,
  • Hans Rutberg1,
  • Mikael Rahmqvist1 and
  • Per Nilsen1
BMC Health Services Research201313:52

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-52

Received: 1 August 2012

Accepted: 30 January 2013

Published: 8 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sander Gaal
6 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Doris Østergaard
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikaela Ridelberg
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sander Gaal
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
8 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis, Linkoping University