Decoupling the use and meaning of strategic plans in public healthcare
© Lega et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 December 2011
Accepted: 22 December 2012
Published: 4 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Rotolo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jalila Jbilou|
|18 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Trerotoli|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chang Won Lee|
|21 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Rotolo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Trerotoli|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.