Healthier choices in an Australian health service: a pre-post audit of an intervention to improve the nutritional value of foods and drinks in vending machines and food outlets
© Bell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 March 2013
Accepted: 7 November 2013
Published: 25 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Colin Bell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tuesday Udell|
|10 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Carter|
|28 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Colin Bell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tuesday Udell|
|16 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Carter|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|25 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-492|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.