Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study
© MacNaughton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 April 2013
Accepted: 14 November 2013
Published: 24 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dawn Goodwin|
|27 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Goldman|
|12 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kate MacNaughton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dawn Goodwin|
|30 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Goldman|
|15 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kate MacNaughton|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Goldman|
|14 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kate MacNaughton|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-486|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.