German translation of the Alberta context tool and two measures of research use: methods, challenges and lessons learned
© Hoben et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 June 2013
Accepted: 14 November 2013
Published: 16 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Catrine Eldh|
|28 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katrin Hertrampf|
|12 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Hoben|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Catrine Eldh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-478|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.