Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluating adverse drug event reporting in administrative data from emergency departments: a validation study

  • Corinne M Hohl1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Lisa Kuramoto3,
  • Eugenia Yu4,
  • Basia Rogula3,
  • Jürgen Stausberg5 and
  • Boris Sobolev3, 6
BMC Health Services Research201313:473

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-473

Received: 23 October 2012

Accepted: 4 November 2013

Published: 12 November 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz
29 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Zed
31 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Hohl
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Hohl
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz
22 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Zed
15 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Hohl
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz
3 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Hohl
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
6 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz
14 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Hohl
Resubmission - Version 9
14 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
4 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-473

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia
(2)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital
(3)
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
(4)
Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia
(5)
InstitutfürMedizinischeInformationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchen
(6)
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia

Advertisement