Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
© Hotvedt and Førde.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 14 February 2012
Accepted: 1 February 2013
Published: 5 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing|
|2 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cordula Wagner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ragnar Hotvedt|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.