Considering quality of care for young adults with diabetes in Ireland
- Myles Balfe†1, 2Email author,
- Ruairi Brugha†1,
- Diarmuid Smith†4,
- Seamus Sreenan†5,
- Frank Doyle†3 and
- Ronan Conroy†1
© Balfe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 December 2012
Accepted: 11 October 2013
Published: 29 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Clancy|
|17 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux|
|16 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Myles Balfe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Myles Balfe|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Clancy|
|3 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Myles Balfe|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|3 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|11 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-448|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.