Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence-based health information from the users’ perspective – a qualitative analysis

  • Irene Hirschberg1Email author,
  • Gabriele Seidel2,
  • Daniel Strech1,
  • Hilda Bastian3 and
  • Marie-Luise Dierks2
BMC Health Services Research201313:405

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-405

Received: 30 January 2013

Accepted: 8 October 2013

Published: 10 October 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zachary Munn
30 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Hinds
23 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zachary Munn
30 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Hinds
7 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 7
7 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
8 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Irene Hirschberg
Resubmission - Version 9
8 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
8 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
10 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-405

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CELLS – Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences/Hannover Medical School, Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine
(2)
Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology
(3)
U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health

Advertisement