Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Primary healthcare in transition – a qualitative study of how managers perceived a system change

  • Andy Maun1Email author,
  • Kerstin Nilsson2,
  • Carina Furåker2 and
  • Jörgen Thorn1
BMC Health Services Research201313:382

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-382

Received: 30 May 2013

Accepted: 25 September 2013

Published: 3 October 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - anders anell
2 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Holt
20 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Andy Maun
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-382

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Health Care, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg
Institute of Health and Caring Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg