Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations- a comparative analysis
© Mathes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 February 2013
Accepted: 26 September 2013
Published: 30 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter G W Ricciardi|
|20 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diana Brixner|
|17 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mathes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter G W Ricciardi|
|9 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diana Brixner|
|3 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mathes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-371|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.