Secondary care intervals before and after the introduction of urgent referral guidelines for suspected cancer in Denmark: a comparative before-after study
© Larsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 February 2012
Accepted: 22 August 2013
Published: 10 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nafees Din|
|30 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lindsay Forbes|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mette Bach Larsen|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nafees Din|
|27 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lindsay Forbes|
|5 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mette Bach Larsen|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|5 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|22 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|10 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-348|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.