A forgotten aspect of the NICE reference case: an observational study of the health related quality of life impact on caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis
© Acaster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 February 2013
Accepted: 21 August 2013
Published: 9 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mitzi Saunders|
|27 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Garrett|
|24 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Acaster|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mitzi Saunders|
|20 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Garrett|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|9 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-346|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.