Recommended content of referral letters from general practitioners to specialised mental health care: a qualitative multi-perspective study
© Hartveit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 January 2013
Accepted: 15 August 2013
Published: 19 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Miriam Hartveit|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Kjellin|
|15 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Evans|
|26 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Miriam Hartveit|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-329|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.