Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study
© McCluskey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 November 2012
Accepted: 13 August 2013
Published: 19 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Lipworth|
|28 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Travaglia|
|13 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Annie McCluskey|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Lipworth|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-323|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.