How the stigma of low literacy can impair patient-professional spoken interactions and affect health: insights from a qualitative investigation
© Easton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 January 2013
Accepted: 15 August 2013
Published: 16 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Kramer|
|29 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Gionfriddo|
|2 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Ridgeway|
|12 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Phyllis Easton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Gionfriddo|
|30 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Kramer|
|30 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Ridgeway|
|12 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Phyllis Easton|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-319|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.