Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of studies included in the meta-regression analysis

From: Frontier-based techniques in measuring hospital efficiency in Iran: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

No.

Author(s)

Publication year

Publication language

Data year

No. of hospitals

Proportion of teaching hospitals (%)

Number of input/output variables

Estimation method

Province

Software used to assess efficiency

Number of estimates

1

Abolhalaj et al. [30]

2011

Persian

2007

122

45.08

4/2

DEA

NA

DEAP 2.1

6

2

Ahmadkiadaliri et al. [31]

2011

English

2006

19

21.05

2/4

DEA

Khuzestan

DEAP 2.1

1

3

Akbari et al. [32]

2012

Persian

2005–2008

20

NA

4/3

DEA

East Azerbaijan

DEAP 2.1

1

4

Alemtabriz & Imanipour [33]

2009

Persian

2005–2007

16

68.75

4/5

DEA

Tehran

LINDO

1

5

Ardakani et al. [34]

2009

Persian

2004–2006

12

33.33

3/3

DEA

Yazd

LINDO

1

6

Asadi et al. [35]

2012

Persian

2008

13

38.46

3/3

DEA

Yazd

DEAP 2.1

1

7

Askari et al. [36]

2012

Persian

2001–2009

13

38.46

4/3

DEA

Yazd

DEAP 2.1

1

8

Farzianpour et al. [37]

2012

English

2008–2010

16

100.00

3/3

DEA

Tehran

GAMS

1

9

Goudarzi [38], Ghaderi et al. [39]*

2006, 2007

Persian

2000–2004

26

42.31

4/4, 4/1

DEA, SFA

Tehran

DEAP 2.1, Frontier 4.1

2

10

Goudarzi et al. [40]

2012

Persian

2001–2007

13

30.77

4/5, 4/1

DEA, SFA

Lorestan

DEAP 2.1, Frontier 4.1

2

11

Hajialiafzali et al. [41]

2007

English

2002

53

0.00

4/4

DEA

NA

DEASOFT-V1

1

12

Hatam [42]

2008

English

1996

18

0.00

2/4

DEA

NA

NA

1

13

Hatam et al. [43]

2010

English

2005–2006

21

NA

3/5

DEA

Fars

GAMS

1

14

Pourmohammadi [44] Hatam et al. [45]*

2009, 2012

Persian & English

2006–2008

64

0.00

4/4, 4/1

DEA, SFA

NA

WIN4DEAP, Frontier 4.1

2

15

Ilbeigi et al. [46]

2012

Persian

2009

17

NA

2/3

DEA

Khorasan Razavi

DEAP 2.1

1

16

Jandaghi et al. [47]

2010

English

2008

8

NA

2/3, 3/3, 5/3, 4/3

DEA

Qom

WIN4DEAP

4

17

Marnani et al. [48]

2012

English

2010

23

56.52

1/4

DEA

Tehran

WIN4DEAP

1

18

Pourreza et al. [49]

2009

Persian

1996–2006

12

83.33

4/4

DEA

Tehran

DEAP 2.1

1

19

Rahimi et al. [50]

2012

Persian

2009

23

17.39

3/2

DEA

West Azerbaijan

DEAP 2.1

1

20

Rezapoor & Asefzadeh [51]

2009

Persian

1998–2007

4

100.00

2/5

DEA

Qazvin

DEAP 2.1

1

21

Sabermahani et al. [52]

2009

Persian

2007

13

23.08

4/3

DEA

Kerman

DEAP 2.1

1

22

Sajadi et al. [53]

2009

Persian

2005–2006

23

13.04

5/5

DEA

Isfahan

DEAP 2.1

2

23

Salehzadeh & Ketabi [54]

2011

Persian

2007

8

37.50

2/2

DEA

Qom

WIN4DEAP, DEA-Master

1

24

Shahhoseini et al. [55]

2011

English

2008

12

33.33

4/5

DEA

NA

DEAP 2.1

1

25

Sheikhzadeh et al. [56]

2012

English

2005

11

45.45

4/3

DEA

East Azerbaijan

DEAP 2.1

1

26

Ahmad Kiadaliri [57]*

2005

Persian

1996–2003

8

62.50

4/4, 4/1

DEA

Tehran

DEAP 2.1

2

27

Najafi [58]*

2008

Persian

2000–2006

12

33.33

2/2

DEA

Ardebil, Tehran

DEAP 2.1

1

28

Kazemi et al. [59]*

2009

Persian

2006–2008

11

18.18

2/2

DEA

Southern Khorasan, Northern Khorasan, Khorasan Razavi

DEAP 2.1

2

29

Zarei [60]*

2000

Persian

1999

57

68.42

6/4

DEA

Tehran

NA

1

  1. *These are grey literature including thesis and conference presentations. Goudarzi and Pourmohammadi published their results of DEA application as a journal article [39, 45].