Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Viewpoints about collaboration between primary care and public health in Canada

  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh1, 2Email author,
  • Ruta Valaitis1,
  • Linda O’Mara1,
  • Patricia Austin1 and
  • Val Munroe3
BMC Health Services Research201313:311

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-311

Received: 21 August 2012

Accepted: 13 August 2013

Published: 14 August 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
21 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Mason
3 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rogerio Pinto
3 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Mason
31 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rogerio Pinto
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-311

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Nursing, McMaster University
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University
Vancouver Coastal Health