Viewpoints about collaboration between primary care and public health in Canada
© Akhtar-Danesh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 August 2012
Accepted: 13 August 2013
Published: 14 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Mason|
|3 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rogerio Pinto|
|3 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Noori Akhtar-Danesh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Mason|
|31 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rogerio Pinto|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-311|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.